Discrimination claims generally allege that an employee, applicant, or customer was treated unfavorably or less favorably because he or she is in a category (such as of a certain race or national origin) protected under federal or state equal employment opportunity statutes. Even if an employee is not in a protected category, discrimination based on someone’s marriage to or association with others in a protected category is also unlawful. Moeller Barbaree’s Atlanta employment lawyers have decades of experience representing clients in lawsuits and arbitrations brought under federal equal employment opportunity statutes, including: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (prohibiting discrimination based on race, sex, color, religion, national origin); hostile work environment (harassment based on protected status and retaliation); the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) (prohibiting discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions); Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, harassment and public accommodation); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (age discrimination, harassment, retaliation); the Equal Pay Act (EPA) (gender-based wage claims); Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) (use of genetic information); 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (race, retaliation); and various state and local anti-discrimination laws.

An employee seeking relief for discrimination initially needs to show she is in a protected category within the meaning of the applicable statute (or associated with someone who is), she suffered an adverse employment action, and others outside the protected category were treated differently or more favorably. Discrimination claims may challenge discriminatory denial of certain terms or conditions of employment (such as paying a lower wage to employees of a certain race) and a wide variety of adverse employment actions, including, for example, refusing to hire, firing, demoting, failing to promote, denying training, and disciplining an employee because of his or her protected category, such as religion or disability. If an employee or applicant can make this initial showing, the employer must show that it took an adverse action for a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason. The employee then has the ultimate burden of proving that the employer’s reason is not the real reason, and the employer was motivated by the employee’s race, sex, color, religion, national origin, pregnancy, disability, or other protected status. Moeller Barbaree’s attorneys have represented employees and employers in discrimination cases like these in Atlanta and many other parts of the country.

The statutes at issue prohibit various types discrimination and include strict requirements for bringing a timely claim and proving intentional discrimination and resulting damages – all factors with which Moeller Barbaree’s Atlanta lawyers are experienced. The following provides a brief overview of discrimination claims by type:

  • Age discrimination – The ADEA prohibits discrimination against people who are age 40 or older. An employer’s policy or practice that applies to everyone may still be illegal under the ADEA if it has an adverse impact on applicants or employees ages 40 or older.
  • Disability discrimination – It is unlawful for an employer to treat an applicant or employee who is a qualified individual with a disability unfavorably because she is disabled. The ADA also requires an employer to provide a reasonable accommodation if an employee or applicant with a disability requests one unless the employer can show the requested accommodation would be an undue hardship.
  • Genetic information discrimination – Under GINA an employer is not permitted to use genetic information in making employment-related decisions. Genetic information includes an employee’s own genetic information and genetic information or diseases in the employee’s family medical history and also includes requests for genetic services or participation in clinical research.
  • Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) discrimination – Some courts recognize that Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity, including transgender status, gender stereotyping, and/or because of sexual orientation. Other courts have been unwilling to extend Title VII’s protection to some of these categories. Some state and local discrimination laws include sexual orientation as a protected category, including the City of Atlanta’s non-discrimination ordinance.
  • National origin discrimination – Title VII prohibits treating applicants or employees less favorably because they are from a particular country or region, because of their ethnicity or accent, and even because they may appear to be of a particular ethnic background.
  • Pregnancy discrimination – A female applicant or employee may not be treated unfavorably because of her pregnancy, childbirth, or any medical condition related to her pregnancy or childbirth under the PDA. Certain pregnancy or childbirth-related conditions may also be protected disabilities under the ADA.
  • Race or color discrimination – Prohibited race discrimination includes treating an applicant or employee unfavorably because of her race or characteristics associated with race. Treating an applicant or employee differently because of her skin color or complexion is also unlawful.
  • Religious discrimination – Title VII prohibits treating applicants or employees less favorably because of their sincerely held religious, ethical, or moral beliefs. An employee cannot be segregated from certain positions because of his religion (including based on what he wears and/or his grooming practices), and an employer may have to reasonably accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs unless the employer would be burdened or suffer undue hardship by doing so.
  • Sex discrimination – Prohibited gender discrimination includes treating an applicant or employee unfavorably because of his/her sex. Even an employer’s policy or practice that applies to all may be unlawful if it has a disparate impact on employment of people of a particular sex.

Free & Confidential Consultation with Our Employment Attorneys

If you need more information about preventing discrimination in the workplace, or pursuing or defending against a claim of discrimination, please contact Moeller Barbaree’s Atlanta attorneys for a free consultation at 404-748-9122, or use our convenient email form.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 404-748-9122
to schedule your free consultation.
  • Vector.svg Free Consultation
  • Experience.svg Experienced Employment Lawyers
  • Language.svg Contact Us Today

Call 404-748-9122